Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease Adjustment for Risk Method II.

BACKGROUND: Current metrics used to adjust for case mix complexity in congenital cardiac catheterization are becoming outdated due to the introduction of novel procedures, innovative technologies, and expanding patient subgroups. This study aims to develop a risk adjustment methodology introducing a novel, clinically meaningful adverse event outcome and incorporating a modern understanding of risk. METHODS: Data from diagnostic only and interventional cases with defined case types were collected for patients ≤18 years of age and ≥2.5 kg at all Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes participating centers. The derivation data set consisted of cases performed from 2014 to 2017, and the validation data set consisted of cases performed from 2019 to 2020. Severity level 3 adverse events were stratified into 3 tiers by clinical impact (3a/b/c); the study outcome was clinically meaningful adverse events, severity level ≥3b (3bc/4/5). RESULTS: The derivation data set contained 15 224 cases, and the validation data set included 9462 cases. Clinically meaningful adverse event rates were 4.5% and 4.2% in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The final risk adjustment model included age <30 days, Procedural Risk in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization risk category, and hemodynamic vulnerability score (C statistic, 0.70; Hosmer-Lemeshow P value, 0.83; Brier score, 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: CHARM II (Congenital Heart Disease Adjustment for Risk Method II) risk adjustment methodology allows for equitable comparison of clinically meaningful adverse events among institutions and operators with varying patient populations and case mix complexity performing pediatric cardiac catheterization.

Neurocognitive function and health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with CHD with pulmonary valve dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive impairment and quality of life are two important long-term challenges for patients with complex CHD. The impact of re-interventions during adolescence and young adulthood on neurocognition and quality of life is not well understood. METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal multi-institutional study, patients 13-30 years old with severe CHD referred for surgical or transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were collected, and executive function and quality of life were assessed prior to the planned pulmonary re-intervention. These results were compared to normative data and were compared between treatment strategies. RESULTS: Among 68 patients enrolled from 2016 to 2020, a nearly equal proportion were referred for surgical and transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (53% versus 47%). Tetralogy of Fallot was the most common diagnosis (59%) and pulmonary re-intervention indications included stenosis (25%), insufficiency (40%), and mixed disease (35%). There were no substantial differences between patients referred for surgical and transcatheter therapy. Executive functioning deficits were evident in 19-31% of patients and quality of life was universally lower compared to normative sample data. However, measures of executive function and quality of life did not differ between the surgical and transcatheter patients. CONCLUSION: In this patient group, impairments in neurocognitive function and quality of life are common and can be significant. Given similar baseline characteristics, comparing changes in neurocognitive outcomes and quality of life after surgical versus transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement will offer unique insights into how treatment approaches impact these important long-term patient outcomes.

1-Year Outcomes in a Pooled Cohort of Harmony Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Clinical Trial Participants.

BACKGROUND: The Harmony transcatheter pulmonary valve (TPV) is the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved device for severe pulmonary regurgitation (PR) in the native or surgically repaired right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). OBJECTIVES: One-year safety and effectiveness of the Harmony TPV were evaluated in patients from the Harmony Native Outflow Tract Early Feasibility Study, Harmony TPV Pivotal Study, and Continued Access Study, representing the largest cohort to date of Harmony TPV recipients. METHODS: Eligible patients had severe PR by echocardiography or PR fraction ≥ 30% by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and clinical indications for pulmonary valve replacement. The primary analysis included 87 patients who received a commercially available TPV22 (n = 42) or TPV25 (n = 45) device; 19 patients who received an early device iteration prior to its discontinuation were evaluated separately. RESULTS: In the primary analysis, median patient age at treatment was 26 years (IQR: 18-37 years) in the TPV22 group and 29 years (IQR: 19-42 years) in the TPV25 group. At 1 year, there were no deaths; 98% of TPV22 and 91% of TPV25 patients were free from the composite of PR, stenosis, and reintervention (moderate or worse PR, mean RVOT gradient >40 mmHg, device-related RVOT reoperation, and catheter reintervention). Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia occurred in 16% of patients. Most patients had none/trace or mild PR (98% of TPV22 patients, 97% of TPV25 patients). Outcomes with the discontinued device are reported separately. CONCLUSIONS: The Harmony TPV device demonstrated favorable clinical and hemodynamic outcomes across studies and valve types through 1 year. Further follow-up will continue to assess long-term valve performance and durability.

Predictors of Serious Adverse Events and High-Level Cardiorespiratory Support in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Vein Interventions.

Patients with pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) often require frequent transcatheter pulmonary vein (PV) interventions for management of restenosis. Predictors of serious adverse events (AEs) and need for high-level cardiorespiratory support (mechanical ventilation, vasoactive support, and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) 48 h after transcatheter PV interventions have not been reported. This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of patients with PVS who underwent transcatheter PV interventions from 3/1/2014 to 12/31/2021. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using generalized estimating equations to account for within-patient correlation. 240 patients underwent 841 catheterizations involving PV interventions (median 2 catheterizations per patient [1,3]). At least one serious AE was reported in 100 (12%) cases, the most common of which were pulmonary hemorrhage (n = 20) and arrhythmia (n = 17). There were 14 severe/catastrophic AEs (1.7% of cases) including three strokes and one patient death. On multivariable analysis, age less than 6 months, low systemic arterial saturation (< 95% in patients with biventricular [BiV] physiology, < 78% in single ventricle [SV] physiology), and severely elevated mean PA pressure (≥ 45 mmHg in BiV, ≥ 17 mmHg in SV) were associated with SAEs. Age less than 1 year, hospitalization prior to catheterization, and moderate-severe RV dysfunction were associated with high-level support after catheterization. Serious AEs during transcatheter PV interventions in patients with PVS are common, although major events such as stroke or death are uncommon. Younger patients and those with abnormal hemodynamics are more likely to experience serious AEs and require high-level cardiorespiratory support after catheterization.

The Need for Surgery After Vascular or Cardiac Trauma, or Technical Adverse Events in the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.

Data on the frequency and outcome of surgical interventions as a result of adverse events (AE) encountered in the pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization laboratory are limited. This study analyzes the outcomes of specific types of AE that are most likely to require immediate surgical intervention. Data from the C3PO registry were analyzed to identify specific types of significant vascular/cardiac trauma or technical adverse events (stent/device/coil embolization/migration). The relationship between these AE and an "adverse outcome" (defined as either surgery, ECMO, or death) were analyzed. Between 01/2014 and 12/2017, 25,731 cases were entered into the C3PO registry. Vascular or cardiac trauma were observed in 92 cases (0.36% cases in C3PO), and technical adverse events were observed in 176 cases (0.68% cases in C3PO). The two highest procedure type risk categories (PREDIC3T) accounted for 61% of the cases in the cardiac/vascular trauma cohort, and 34% in the technical AE cohort. For vascular/cardiac trauma, 24 (26%) had an adverse outcome, with ECMO in 8 (9%), surgery in 19 (20%), and death in 9 (10%). For technical AE 25 (14%) had an adverse outcome, with ECMO in 3 (2%), surgery in 23 (13%), and death in 3 (2%). Survival after cardiac surgery secondary to an AE was 68% for cardiac/vascular trauma, and 96% for technical adverse events. RF perforation of the pulmonary valve was the procedure most likely to result in cardiac/vascular trauma (10%), with 57% of those having an adverse outcome. Atrial septal interventions accounted for 29% of all adverse outcomes in the cardiac/vascular trauma cohort. Non-elective or emergent cases were associated with a significantly higher incidence of an adverse outcome for both, cardiac/vascular trauma (OR 7.1) and technical adverse events (OR 2.7). Surgery within the last 30 days was associated with a significantly higher incidence of an adverse outcome for cardiac/vascular trauma only (OR 4.2). Significant cardiac/vascular trauma or stent/device/coil embolization/migration are rare, but high consequence AE. With appropriate surgical and ECMO backup, a high survival can be achieved. The potential need for and impact of immediate surgical backup seems to be higher for cardiac/vascular trauma (in particular after specific case types), than for device/coil migration/embolization, and as such case specific backup arrangements are required.

Exploring procedure duration and risk for serious adverse events during congenital cardiac catheterization.

Objectives: While procedure length is considered an important metric for cardiothoracic surgical procedures, the relationship between procedure length and adverse events (AEs) in congenital cardiac catheterizations has little published data available. Furthermore, most existing congenital cardiac catheterization risk prediction models are built on logistic regression models. This study aimed to characterize the relationship between case length and AE occurrence in congenital cardiac catheterization while adjusting for known risk factors and to investigate the potential role of non-linear analysis in risk modeling. Design: Age, case type, and procedure duration were evaluated for relationships with the primary outcome using logistic regression. Non-linearity of the associations with continuous risk factors was assessed using restricted cubic spline transformations. Setting and participants: All diagnostic and interventional congenital cardiac catheterization cases performed at Boston Children's Hospital between January 1, 2014 and October 31, 2019 were analyzed. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was defined as the occurrence of any clinically significant (level 3/4/5) AE. Results: A total of 7011 catheterization cases met inclusion criteria, with interventional procedures accounting for 68% of cases. Median case duration was 97 min. A multivariable model including age, procedure type, and case duration showed a significant relationship between case duration and AE occurrence (OR 1.07 per 10 min increase, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.09, p<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrated the importance of procedure duration as a potential frontier for procedure risk management. Better understanding of the role of procedure duration in cardiac catheterizations may provide opportunities for quality improvement in patient safety and resource planning.

COVID-19 international experience in paediatric patients with congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: As COVID-19 continues to affect the global population, it is crucial to study the impact of the disease in vulnerable populations. This study of a diverse, international cohort aims to provide timely, experiential data on the course of disease in paediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Data were collected by capitalising on two pre-existing CHD registries, the International Quality Improvement Collaborative for Congenital Heart Disease: Improving Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes. 35 participating sites reported data for all patients under 18 years of age with diagnosed CHD and known COVID-19 illness during 2020 identified at their institution. Patients were classified as low, moderate or high risk for moderate or severe COVID-19 illness based on patient anatomy, physiology and genetic syndrome using current published guidelines. Association of risk factors with hospitalisation and intensive care unit (ICU) level care were assessed. RESULTS: The study included 339 COVID-19 cases in paediatric patients with CHD from 35 sites worldwide. Of these cases, 84 patients (25%) required hospitalisation, and 40 (12%) required ICU care. Age <1 year, recent cardiac intervention, anatomical complexity, clinical cardiac status and overall risk were all significantly associated with need for hospitalisation and ICU admission. A multivariable model for ICU admission including clinical cardiac status and recent cardiac intervention produced a c-statistic of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: These observational data suggest risk factors for hospitalisation related to COVID-19 in paediatric CHD include age, lower functional cardiac status and recent cardiac interventions. There is a need for further data to identify factors relevant to the care of patients with CHD who contract COVID-19 illness.

Early Postoperative Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Outcomes: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Early postoperative catheterizations (EPOCs) within 6 weeks after a congenital heart surgical procedure can treat residual lesions and provide important clinical information. However, EPOCs are often assumed to impose additional risk on a vulnerable patient population. This study aimed to describe the EPOC population, evaluate procedural safety, compare EPOC patients with procedure-matched non-EPOC patients, and determine risk factors for poor outcomes using data from the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes registry. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort, demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were analyzed for diagnostic and interventional catheterizations performed in 13 participating institutions from January 2014 to December 2017, excluding patients after heart transplant. The primary outcome was a high-severity adverse event (AE). Three distinct analyses included (1) describing the full cohort and EPOC patients, (2) comparing EPOC patients with and without a high-severity AE, and (3) comparing EPOC patients with controls matched on case type. RESULTS: This study included 17,776 catheterizations, with 1399 EPOCs. The high-severity AE rate was 6.4% overall, 8.9% in the EPOC cohort, and 8.4% in matched controls (P = .74). The association between EPOC status and high-severity AE was not significant in a multivariable model (P = .17). In EPOCs with a high-severity AE, median procedure duration was 30 minutes longer (P < .001), and median time from surgical procedure to catheterization was 3 days longer (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: EPOC was not associated with additional risk. Individual patient characteristics of size and hemodynamic vulnerability may serve as informative predictors. Timely catheterization may preempt further clinical deterioration, and intraprocedure duration optimization may correlate with improved outcomes.

Changes in Practice/Outcomes of Pediatric/Congenital Catheterization in Response to the First Wave of COVID.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed tremendous stress on the health care system. Its effects on pediatric/congenital catheterization program practice and performance have not been described. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how case volumes, risk-profile, and outcomes of pediatric/congenital catheterization procedures changed in response to the first wave of COVID-19 and after that wave. Methods: A multicenter retrospective observational study was performed using Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes Registry (C3PO) data to study changes in volume, case mix, and outcomes (high-severity adverse events [HSAEs]) during the first wave of COVID (March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020) in comparison to the period prior to (January 1, 2019, to February 28, 2020) and after (June 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020) the first wave. Multivariable analyses adjusting for case type, hemodynamic vulnerability, and age group were performed. Hospital responses to the first wave were captured with an electronic study instrument. Results: During the study period, 12,557 cases were performed at 14 C3PO hospitals (with 8% performed during the first wave of COVID and 32% in the postperiod). Center case volumes decreased from a median 32.1 cases/month (IQR: 20.7-49.0 cases/month) before COVID to 22 cases/month (IQR: 13-31 cases/month) during the first wave (P = 0.001). The proportion of cases with risk factors for HSAE increased during the first wave, specifically proportions of infants and neonates (P < 0.001) and subjects with renal insufficiency (P = 0.02), recent cardiac surgery (P < 0.001), and a higher hemodynamic vulnerability score (P = 0.02). The observed HSAE risk did not change significantly (P = 0.13). In multivariable analyses, odds of HSAE during the first wave of COVID (odds ratio: 0.75) appeared to be lower than that before COVID, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.09). Conclusions: Despite increased case-mix complexity, C3PO programs maintained, if not improved, their performance in terms of HSAE. Exploratory analyses of practice changes may inform future harm-reduction efforts.

ICU Admission Tool for Congenital Heart Catheterization (iCATCH): A Predictive Model for High Level Post-Catheterization Care and Patient Management.

OBJECTIVES: Currently, there are no prediction tools available to identify patients at risk of needing high-complexity care following cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease. We sought to develop a method to predict the likelihood a patient will require intensive care level resources following elective cardiac catheterization. DESIGN: Prospective single-center study capturing important patient and procedural characteristics for predicting discharge to the ICU. Characteristics significant at the 0.10 level in the derivation dataset (July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019) were considered for inclusion in the final multivariable logistic regression model. The model was validated in the testing dataset (January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020). The novel pre-procedure cardiac status (PCS) feature, collection started in January 2019, was assessed separately in the final model using the 2019 through 2020 dataset. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric heart center. PATIENTS: All elective cases coming from home or non-ICU who underwent a cardiac catheterization from July 2017 to December 2020. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 2,192 cases were recorded in the derivation dataset, of which 11% of patients ( n = 245) were admitted to the ICU, while 64% ( n = 1,413) were admitted to a medical unit and 24% ( n = 534) were discharged home. In multivariable analysis, the following predictors were identified: 1) weight less than 5 kg and 5-9.9 kg, 2) presence of systemic illness, 3) recent cardiac intervention less than 90 days, and 4) ICU Admission Tool for Congenital Heart Catheterization case type risk categories (1-5), with C -statistics of 0.79 and 0.76 in the derivation and testing cohorts, respectively. The addition of the PCS feature fit into the final model resulted in a C -statistic of 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: The creation of a validated pre-procedural risk prediction model for ICU admission following congenital cardiac catheterization using a large volume, single-center, academic institution will improve resource allocation and prediction of capacity needs for this complex patient population.

Interpreting Quality Improvement When Introducing New Technology: A Collaborative Experience in ASD Device Closures.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the regular introduction of new technologies into interventional cardiac catheterization procedures, in this case new atrial septal defect (ASD) closure devices, while conducting a multi-center collaborative initiative to reduce radiation usage during all procedures. Data were collected prospectively by 8 C3PO institutions between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017 for ASD device closure procedures in the cardiac catheterization lab during a quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed at reducing patient radiation exposure. Radiation exposure was measured in dose area product per body weight (µGy*m2/kg). Use of proposed practice change strategies at the beginning and end of the QI intervention period was assessed. Radiation exposure was summarized by institution and by initial type of device used for closure. This study included 602 ASD device closures. Without changes in patient characteristics, total fluoroscopy duration, or number of digital acquisitions, median radiation exposure decreased from 37 DAP/kg to 14 DAP/kg from 2014 to 2017. While all individual centers decreased overall median DAP/kg, the use of novel devices for ASD closure correlated with a temporary period of worsening institutional radiation exposure and increased fluoroscopy time. The introduction of new ASD closure devices resulted in increased radiation exposure during a QI project designed to reduce radiation exposure. Therefore, outcome assessment must be contextualized in QI projects, hospital evaluation, and public reporting, to acknowledge the expected variation during innovation and introduction of novel therapies.

Long-Term Outcomes After Melody Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement in the US Investigational Device Exemption Trial.

BACKGROUND: The Melody valve was developed to extend the useful life of previously implanted right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) conduits or bioprosthetic pulmonary valves, while preserving RV function and reducing the lifetime burden of surgery for patients with complex congenital heart disease. METHODS: Enrollment for the US Investigational Device Exemption study of the Melody valve began in 2007. Extended follow-up was completed in 2020. The primary outcome was freedom from transcatheter pulmonary valve (TPV) dysfunction (freedom from reoperation, reintervention, moderate or severe pulmonary regurgitation, and/or mean RVOT gradient >40 mm Hg). Secondary end points included stent fracture, catheter reintervention, surgical conduit replacement, and death. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one subjects with RVOT conduit or bioprosthetic pulmonary valve dysfunction were enrolled. One hundred fifty underwent Melody TPV replacement. Median age was 19 years (Q1-Q3: 15-26). Median discharge mean RVOT Doppler gradient was 17 mm Hg (Q1-Q3: 12-22). The 149 patients implanted >24 hours were followed for a median of 8.4 years (Q1-Q3: 5.4-10.1). At 10 years, estimated freedom from mortality was 90%, from reoperation 79%, and from any reintervention 60%. Ten-year freedom from TPV dysfunction was 53% and was significantly shorter in children than in adults. Estimated freedom from TPV-related endocarditis was 81% at 10 years (95% CI, 69%-89%), with an annualized rate of 2.0% per patient-year. CONCLUSIONS: Ten-year outcomes from the Melody Investigational Device Exemption trial affirm the benefits of Melody TPV replacement in the lifetime management of patients with RVOT conduits and bioprosthetic pulmonary valves by providing sustained symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement in the majority of patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00740870.

Procedural Risk in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization (PREDIC3T).

Background Advancements in the field, including novel procedures and multiple interventions, require an updated approach to accurately assess patient risk. This study aims to modernize patient hemodynamic and procedural risk classification through the creation of risk assessment tools to be used in congenital cardiac catheterization. Methods and Results Data were collected for all cases performed at sites participating in the C3PO (Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes) multicenter registry. Between January 2014 and December 2017, 23 119 cases were recorded in 13 participating institutions, of which 88% of patients were <18 years of age and 25% <1 year of age; a high-severity adverse event occurred in 1193 (5.2%). Case types were defined by procedure(s) performed and grouped on the basis of association with the outcome, high-severity adverse event. Thirty-four unique case types were determined and stratified into 6 risk categories. Six hemodynamic indicator variables were empirically assessed, and a novel hemodynamic vulnerability score was determined by the frequency of high-severity adverse events. In a multivariable model, case-type risk category (odds ratios for category: 0=0.46, 1=1.00, 2=1.40, 3=2.68, 4=3.64, and 5=5.25; all P≤0.005) and hemodynamic vulnerability score (odds ratio for score: 0=1.00, 1=1.27, 2=1.89, and ≥3=2.03; all P≤0.006) remained independent predictors of patient risk. Conclusions These case-type risk categories and the weighted hemodynamic vulnerability score both serve as independent predictors of patient risk for high-severity adverse events. This contemporary procedure-type risk metric and weighted hemodynamic vulnerability score will improve our understanding of patient and procedural outcomes.